Friday, November 11, 2016

Edcamp Beaver Dam

edCamp BD logo 2 PNG.png
Where can you spend a Saturday morning sharing ideas about a variety of education-related topics with educators across twelve different school districts and 14 different grade levels? At Edcamp! Last Saturday, Beaver Dam Unified School District hosted the second annual Edcamp Beaver Dam. In short, Edcamp is an unconference designed specifically for educators. It is a free sponsor-based professional development and learning opportunity where attendees create the agenda. Then they become note-takers and facilitators of the individual sessions. Edcamp prides itself in participant choice, therefore people are free to leave sessions at will to attend another without hurting anyone’s ego!

This year, more than 50 educators attended the Edcamp held at the Beaver Dam Middle School. At the start of Edcamp, attendees met to post suggestions for topics of interest for the day. Edcamp Beaver Dam used the Padlet Application to record suggestions. Next, the topics were sorted into categories for session assignments. This year’s schedule offered 28 different opportunities during four 50-minute sessions. The topics ranged from mental health, to G Suite (formerly Google Apps for Education), to student engagement and motivation, to mindfulness, reading strategies, and the growth mindset. After four engaging sessions, all attendees regrouped for the closing comments. Finally, the day concluded with a sponsor-based raffle. Attendees won prizes to be used in their classrooms. It was an amazing morning of collaboration and learning.

Thursday, September 29, 2016

Wilson Elementary School Earns National Recognition

A third school in the Beaver Dam Unified School District has been honored this week as a National Blue Ribbon School of Distinction.  The United States Department of Education announced today that Wilson Elementary School has been chosen as a 2016 National Blue Ribbon School.  Wilson joins both South Beaver Dam and Lincoln Elementary schools as National Blue Ribbon Schools of Distinction.  
The award recognizes Wilson School students for their overall academic excellence.  The United States Department of Education will recognize only 329 public and private schools in the country this year.  This is not an award in which a school merely submits an application; the schools are chosen by the Department of Education based on the student academic performance on state assessments.  The award affirms the hard work of Beaver Dam students, families, and the world-class staff who comprise the Wilson School learning community and the Beaver Dam Unified School District as a whole.  The National Blue Ribbon School flag gracing a school’s building is widely recognized as a symbol of exemplary teaching and learning.
All school academic recognitions are a reflection of the exemplary school system that is thriving in Beaver Dam.  When we celebrate the successes of Wilson School students, we celebrate the hard work and success of all students, families, and employees who make up our learning community in the Beaver Dam Unified School District.  We will continue to work vigorously to guide students and empower futures while leading the way in student growth and academic achievement.   It is another great day to live, work, and learn in Beaver Dam!

U.S. Department of Education, National Blue Ribbon Schools announcement:
https://youtu.be/heb5Mtr51BM

Wilson Elementary School Earns National Recognition

A third school in the Beaver Dam Unified School District has been honored this week as a National Blue Ribbon School of Distinction.  The United States Department of Education announced today that Wilson Elementary School has been chosen as a 2016 National Blue Ribbon School.  Wilson joins both South Beaver Dam and Lincoln Elementary schools as National Blue Ribbon Schools of Distinction.  
The award recognizes Wilson School students for their overall academic excellence.  The United States Department of Education will recognize only 329 public and private schools in the country this year.  This is not an award in which a school merely submits an application; the schools are chosen by the Department of Education based on the student academic performance on state assessments.  The award affirms the hard work of Beaver Dam students, families, and the world-class staff who comprise the Wilson School learning community and the Beaver Dam Unified School District as a whole.  The National Blue Ribbon School flag gracing a school’s building is widely recognized as a symbol of exemplary teaching and learning.
All school academic recognitions are a reflection of the exemplary school system that is thriving in Beaver Dam.  When we celebrate the successes of Wilson School students, we celebrate the hard work and success of all students, families, and employees who make up our learning community in the Beaver Dam Unified School District.  We will continue to work vigorously to guide students and empower futures while leading the way in student growth and academic achievement.   It is another great day to live, work, and learn in Beaver Dam!

Thursday, September 1, 2016

Building Relationship From the Beginning

The article below was written by Rick Wormeli and appeared in September's issue of EdLeadership.  The citation for the article is at the end.  Enjoy!

What to Do in Week One?

In the school district where I taught for many years, school always began on the Tuesday after Labor Day. Our middle school teaching team, which served 185 students, competed every year to see who could learn every student's name by Friday. Most years, I won.
While students worked in my class, I used memory techniques to review their names. After school, I studied pictures of them. I asked students to switch their seats each day, sometimes even in the middle of class, and then I identified each one of them anew. I practiced naming them as they entered my room and in the cafeteria during lunch. I dared students to try to trick me into associating them with an incorrect name; I bungled a few, and there were a lot of laughs. But by the end of the fourth day of school, I knew all 185 students' names.

It was the first leg of the year's journey in relationship building. Parents wrote notes and e-mails marveling that I knew their child so well so quickly and predicting that this was going to be a great school year for their child. Of course, I didn't really know their children yet. But all of us feel honored when others whom we respect think our names are worth remembering. In that simple act, we make a connection.
It's like the Na'vi expression of deep respect in the movie Avatar: "I see you." When we affirm to each student, "Yes, you exist; I accept all that you are, and I value time in your company," it opens the door to the successful teaching-learning dynamic so important to academic success.
For many of us, the daily connections we make with colleagues and students have become routine. But these connections can make all the difference for our students. That moment at the end of lunch with 13-year-old Owen, in which the two of us wondered how Doctor Who could travel back and forth through time and space in his TARDIS without causing time paradoxes, may have been the first time Owen had a conversation with an adult who accepted him as an equal partner in the discussion. It was fresh and exciting for Owen, and his limbic system and autonomic nervous system surged with well-being. Now he wants more connections like this. And the more such positive connections he makes, the more personally and academically resilient he'll be.

Yes, It Is That Important

Although we can build positive relationships throughout the school year, the first weeks are crucial. They set the tone and conditions for the year ahead, creating a more effective teaching and learning enterprise for everyone. James Comer, professor of child psychiatry at Yale University, often declares, "No significant learning can occur without a significant relationship." This connection is especially powerful for students who struggle. As Rabbi Harold Kushner said in an interview with Educational Leadership,
Often I will read about someone from the most unpromising circumstances—inner-city ghetto, drug family, single-parent home, abandoned by father, abandoned by both parents sometimes—and the child will have grown up to be a star athlete, a successful politician, or a doctor. The reporter will ask, "How did you get to be who you are?" And the answer will always begin with the same four words: "There was this teacher." (Scherer, 1998, p. 22)
For all humans—and especially teens and young teens—whatever enters our brains as we learn activates emotional responses, even before we process it cognitively. Even if teachers deliver curriculum content with an inert, unemotional lens, our students' internal monologue takes it to an emotional level—"This is so tight/wrong/bad/cool/radical/wild/dope/stupid/GOAT (Greatest of All Time)!"
Research by Mary Helen Immordino-Yang demonstrates that students need to feel a meaningful emotional connection to the material to learn. In an interview, she asserted,
People think of emotion as getting in the way of cognition, but it doesn't. Emotion steers our thinking; it's the rudder that directs our mind and organizes what we need to do. (Sparks, 2016)
Positive teacher-student relationships build on this connection to promote learning. An extensive research base shows that
improving students' relationships with teachers has important, positive and long-lasting implications for both students' academic and social development. (Rimm-Kaufman & Sandilos, 2016)
In sum, students' learning is markedly influenced by their connectedness with the adults in charge, classmates, and the larger community. How can we take advantage of this dynamic to support learning, especially in the first weeks of school?

Make Sure Students Feel Safe

The most urgent questions students ask as they begin a new school year are, Am I safe? and, Do I belong? Once students feel sure these needs are met, they'll dive into learning. We can't take successful communication of these assurances for granted, though. We have to prove them to students every day. What can teachers do?
First, let's laugh at our own mistakes, and model what it looks like to acknowledge our blunders publicly and handle them constructively. Let's not ridicule students' questions ("Why can't we see latitude/longitude lines from the air?" "Seriously, Mr. Wormeli, did we land on the moon?" "Why are women always naked in Renaissance paintings?"). Let's remove all sarcasm from our comments, realizing that the sting of even a small, tossed-away remark can leave a lasting scar.

Let's not assume that students understand the idioms and references we use; let's accept instead that we have to make the implicit explicit: "When I refer to syntax or describe sentences as being parallel, I'm referring to the repetition among the phrases used to improve flow and clarity for the reader. Here, let's line up these three sentences to see how they're parallel."
And let's not take students' inappropriate comments or reactions to our teaching personally. Instead, let's respond with concern: "That doesn't sound like you, Matthew. What's really going on?"
We can withhold judgment when giving descriptive feedback. Instead of writing, "This is incoherent—rewrite!" in the margin of the student's paper, we might write, "I see you've included five arguments in this paragraph, but I don't see how they're connected. Can you suggest a way to make your point more clearly?" Instead of, "Excellent math work!" we might write, "You isolated the variable to one side of the equation sign. What does that enable you to do now?" Instead of pronouncing a grade on a small project immediately, we might ask students to write a letter analyzing how their effort does or does not match the exemplar provided, and if it doesn't match, what they'd need to change to achieve a full match between the two—then give them time to make those changes.
Judgment on the quality of work distances students from us; it creates the need to save face, and it seems adversarial. In contrast, thoughtful, specific feedback positions us as a personal advocate. Students are willing to connect with an advocate.
In class discussions, students will offer something incorrect from time to time. We need to correct the statements without rejecting the students and stalling their participation. Here are some suggestions for responding in a way that respects a student's dignity.
Affirm risk-taking. "You know, Carl, that answer is actually incorrect, but thank you for taking the chance and getting it out there as something for the rest of us to consider. That's what scholars do!"
Ask the student to explain more about his thinking. When students explain further, they often discover their errors. If we identify the errors for them, it raises defensive walls and causes embarrassment.
Be empathetic to their thinking. We can tell a student that we used to think this way (even if we didn't), but we changed our mind when we read the information at the bottom of page 89 (the page intended for last night's reading that this student failed to do). "Let's see whether reading that section changes your thinking, too."
Change the current reality. Sophia needs a win today. So after she responds to a question with the incorrect answer, we respond with, "That's the answer to the question I was about to ask," even if it wasn't. It is now, though, and we go on to ask it so that Sophia can offer her answer again and experience being correct.
If a student indicates that she doesn't know the answer to our question, we can ask, "Pretend that youdid know the answer—what words would come out of your mouth?" A teacher in Naples, Maine, taught me this, and, gosh, it works. Students answer every time, and most often, they're good answers. The student didn't trust herself, so I had to provide her with a different reality.
Affirm the portions that are correct and invite focus on the incorrect portions. "Your claims are based on the author's perspective, Leila. Thank you for making that so important. I'm having trouble, however, finding the specific evidence you're using to make the claims. Can you help me find it?"
One last note about trust: We can never forget that we are under scrutiny. Students notice how we interact with their classmates and our colleagues. If we're curt, insincere, unfair, indifferent, or less than supportive with others, they'll assume that we might be that way with them, despite any previous positive experiences.
Students detest duplicity in their teachers. The first few weeks should provide consistent proof of personal authenticity. So the words we use with parents are the same ones we use with students. We follow up on our promises. We don't use sarcasm with our colleagues if we don't allow it in the classroom (the same goes with chewing gum). We are sad at sad moments and happy at happy moments. We don't always embrace students' cultural likes and dislikes just to be more accepted by them. We share our unique interests—a favorite sport or book; how much we liked Legos as a child; our dream of going into space someday; our fondness for summer camp, bike touring, and pecan pie; and a little about our families and our deep commitments to them. In short, we're our real selves.

Know Your Students Well

We can't connect with students we don't know. To provide them with meaningful learning experiences and to construct a supportive classroom community, we need to know them.
"Selected Things to Know About Your Students" (p. 15) lists just some of the areas that can affect learning. A single teacher won't be able to gather data in all these areas, of course, so we should make information gathering a full-year process, and consider dividing it up among departments in the school and posting it to a secure, confidential profile system maintained by the guidance department. In addition, many teachers find it helpful to include the following activities in the first weeks of school.
Invite parents to comment. In 2003, Deb Bova shared a simple strategy on the MiddleWeb listserv that exploded worldwide—sending home an open-ended invitation on the first day of school that says, "In amillion words or less, tell me about your child." In my own experience and that of other teachers who have tried it, this strategy garners insights regarding students that conventional parent surveys don't often provide. Parents find the prompt engaging; many comment that they've never been asked to write something like this before.
Invite students to write—as their parents. Tell students, "Write a letter from your parent to the teacher describing you." When people write under a pseudonym, it's often freeing. We include things we might normally filter. In the years I used this activity, students made statements like, "If it's important to remember, please write it on the board or screen. Otherwise, Jerry doesn't think it's important." "Micah has Hebrew school on Sundays and Wednesdays, so he probably won't do homework on those days." "It drives Carla crazy when there's nothing creative, so don't be boring." and, "Lena finds sweat stains under teachers' armpits revolting, so please keep them dry or don't raise your arms."
Caution students when writing such letters to stick to factors that affect their classroom learning. They should not reveal anything too confidential or personal. If they want to share personal information, they should first get their parents' permission or maybe even ask the parents to share it themselves.
Offer "Best Way for Me to Learn" cards. Students fill out an index card with their name and everything they can think of that helps them learn. Using these cards over the years, I learned that students wanted me to use high-contrast colors on dry erase boards, to provide more than two examples when explaining something, to speak more slowly, to allow students to drink water or juice in class, to switch who was doing the teaching sometimes (resulting in more student-led instruction), to identify online tutorials covering the same material I was teaching, and to make sure my homework wasn't busy work "just to look like a tough teacher." I also learned that many students get frustrated with group projects. All helpful to know.
Spend time in shared efforts. One of the best ways to get to know students and build strong connections is to share time in complex or work-intensive activities. Spending a full day early in the school year hiking a mountain with students, for example, forges strong teacher-student relationships, especially as you help one another navigate narrow boulder passes at higher altitudes. Witnessing our students outside normal classroom and school contexts reveals something closer to their true selves. It's gold.

Sponsoring a student club, sport, or extracurricular activity (school newspaper, TV station, or literary magazine) or joining students in a small on-stage or behind-the-scenes role in the school musical are excellent ways to create esprit de corps. In such experiences, we recognize the value in one another and in working together. We can't help but be loyal to one another and invested in one another's success. For students—and for teachers—this is often a pleasant surprise.

Practice Empathy

Students feel connected to teachers whom they perceive as understanding them. To inhabit another, however, we must inhibit ourselves—subordinating our own knowledge and perspectives for a moment and embracing the other's world. This takes practice. We can begin the school year focusing on these few empathy-building steps:
  • Make home visits and observe students' roles in the family and who they are at home.
  • Sit in students' desks and see the room from their point of view, and adjust lessons and visuals accordingly.
  • Ask students to explain their thinking verbally, in writing, or as they teach a classmate. Understanding, or lack thereof, is quickly revealed in these processes.
  • Recognize our own intellectual bias. "It's so clear in my own head; why isn't it clear in Kiki's head?" we reason. "Everyone else learned it this way, so it must be something wrong with Kiki. She's not trying hard enough." Effective teachers look through the first-timer's eyes as they plan and deliver instruction. They catch misconceptions before they fester, perceive helpful connections and clarifications for students, and avoid teaching today's lessons through automated verbal memory from their years of expertise in the topic.
  • Attend to students' essential human needs. Indifference to basic health does not engender goodwill. So be attentive: Are students hydrated, well-fed, and rested? Are they moving enough to get oxygen to the brain? Do we need more lighting, fresh air, or different seats? Can everyone see the display area? Do all students have equal access to the tools this lesson requires?
  • Avoid over-generalizing about students. English language learners, for instance, vary widely in language proficiencies, educational background, need for support, creativity, and more; treating them all the same undermines teacher-student relationships and students' learning. Affirm students as the individuals they are, not the limited stereotypes invoked by our limited experience. The Thai student in 5th period is not the official spokesperson for everyone from Thailand. The student with ear buds seemingly fused into his ears may not be trying to block out the world by listening to his favorite hip-hop artists, but instead listening to thoughtful podcasts of great poetry, gaming strategies, or speeches from his religious leaders. The student with purple hair may be a happy, well-adjusted rule follower who just happens to like purple hair.

We're In This Together

Face it: We can only do our jobs as teachers if students do what we ask of them. On any day, students can refuse to participate or can even get up and walk out. In some classrooms, cooperation is tenuous at best, but in successful classrooms it's on solid ground. Teaching is done with students, not to them.
To create that mutual ethos, teachers and students employ civil discourse that honors what each group brings to the table. When disagreeing, we demonstrate that we've heard and understood the other's point of view. We don't diminish one another with derision. We assume that at any given moment in the lesson, both of us—teacher and student—are probably doing the best we can. If we wrong each other in some manner, we apologize and try to make amends.
Both of us want respect for our efforts and our individual natures; we want to be accepted and to matter to others. As teachers, we show respect by being knowledgeable in our fields and in how to teach them, by following through on our promises, and by finding ways to make curriculum content meaningful to students. To show respect to us, students do the class activities and assignments, follow our classroom rules, and make sincere efforts to learn course content without complaint.
Mutuality is not just helpful to students; it's also invigorating to teachers. We are more willing to invest in students when we feel connected to them. We get excited as we plan lessons for particular individuals, take satisfaction in responding to student work and providing helpful feedback, and enjoy students' "aha!" moments when we've really made the connection. This is why we went into teaching in the first place; it's where we find the strength to work hard all day and late into the evening and then get up the next morning and do it all over again.
Yes, student, you exist. I accept all that you are, and I value time in your company. You will commit to being the best version of your maturing self, just as I will commit to being the best version of my maturing self for you. We'll achieve our goals together. Now, I see that your name is "Ellie." Is it short for something? Tell me more. You are a person worth knowing.

Selected Things to Know About Your Students


  • Socioeconomic status
  • Family dynamics
  • Nationality
  • Student's transience rate
  • Parents' jobs
  • Home responsibilities
  • After-school work schedule
  • Previous school experiences
  • Religious affiliation
  • English language learner status
  • Technology access and proficiency
  • Personal interests (sports, music, television, movies, books, hobbies, other)
  • Physical health/maturity
  • Behavior/discipline concerns
  • Social-emotional learning strengths and challenges
  • Existence of Individualized Education Plan
  • Challenges such as Tourette syndrome, Asperger syndrome, ADHD
  • Vision or hearing problems
  • Gifted/advanced learner
  • LGBT identity and transitions
  • Leadership qualities
  • Multiple intelligences
  • Myers-Briggs personality profile

References

Rimm-Kaufmann, S., & Sandilos, L. (2016). Improving students' relationships with teachers to provide essential supports for learning. Retrieved from American Psychological Association website
Scherer, M. (1998, December). Is school the place for spirituality? A conversation with Rabbi Harold KushnerEducational Leadership, 56(4), 18–22.
Sparks, S. D. (2016, April 26). Emotions help steer students' learning, studies find. Education Week,35(29). Retrieved from www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2016/04/27/emotions-help-steer-students-learning-studies-find.html
Rick Wormeli (www.rickwormeli.com) is a long-time teacher, now an education consultant. He is the author of 10 education books, including Fair Isn't Always Equal (Stenhouse, 2006) and Summarization in Any Subject (ASCD, 2005). Follow him on Twitter.

Thursday, August 18, 2016

Questions About the November 8 Referendum

Why is the school district focused on facility needs at our high school?
In 2011, the school district completed a comprehensive analysis of all district facilities.  The analysis identified tier one, two, and three needs throughout the school district.  Tier one needs spanned all schools and totaled $10 million.  These needs were addressed since the study was completed, leaving tier one needs remaining at the high school.  The school district made the decision in 2014 to complete a comprehensive analysis of tier one needs at our high school.  The district is now focused on how to address the substantial needs at our high school.  Both the 2011 and 2014 studies are located on our website.  



Will other schools receive facility upgrades from a successful referendum?
In 2014, the school district completed a safety audit of all schools in the district.   All schools need upgraded entrance systems that meet 2016 safety standards.  Our school entrances are currently not safe.  Consistent with 2016 standards, safe-school entrances allow building staff to “buzz” a visitor into a secure-office area, complete a background check, and then allow the visitor access to the rest of the school.  The school district’s community survey shows more than 85% of responding citizens support safety renovations.    


Why isn’t the school board recommending building a new high school?
The comprehensive cost of a new high school built to serve 1,100 students is in excess of $110 million dollars.  Current needs at our high school equal $48 to $50 million.  There is approximately $60 to $70 million of structural value in our current school.  Our high school is land rich and is conveniently located near a major highway.  The architectural and construction firms the school district has contracted with do not recommend building a new school.  


Is the district proposing a “quick fix” to the needs at the high school?
The November 8th referendum question represents a long term solution to our high school facility issues.  The community survey results show that 68% of respondents support a comprehensive solution to our high-school facility needs.  The referendum question posed to voters on November 8 will address all high-school facility needs and safety-and-security needs across all schools.  The solution the school board is proposing to the the community represents a long-term (25-30 years) solution to our high school facility needs.


How can the public give input?
There are a variety of methods for community members to provide input.  The school district is seeking input through community tours of the high school on August 8 at 6:00 p.m.; September 6 at 6:00 p.m.; October 3 at 6:00 p.m.; October 10 at 7:00 a.m.; and November 1 at 6:00 p.m.  The school district will host a call-in radio show on WBEV at 11:10 on August 23, September 27, and October 25.  The school board hosts a drop-in coffee discussion at Edith’s Cafe the second Thursday morning of each month from 7:30 am to 8:30 am.  The district answers all questions presented on the district’s Facebook page or Twitter account.  Lastly, the school district’s website has an open-comment and question page under the facilities tab that offers anyone in the community opportunity to ask questions or give input. Please check the web page for up-to-the-minute date and times for community input: Public Input Opportunities


How old is the high school?
Our current high school was built in 1958 to house 800 students and approximately 85 staff.  The building currently holds 1,100 students and 110 staff members.  The technology-education wing was built in 1976.


Will the district remove all asbestos from the school as part of a major project?
Yes.  


Is the school district currently working with MPTC, and how can they help with our needs?
MPTC and BDUSD have an excellent working relationship.  Superintendent Steve Vessey meets with representatives from MPTC no less than four times a year.  BDHS offers more than 15 courses where students can earn both high-school and MPTC credit for their work.  On average, more than twenty high-school students spend a portion of their school day at MPTC.  


What was the process the school district used to decide a referendum is needed and for what amount?
Over the course of the 2015-2016 school year, the school board and administration shared information and listened to input regarding whether a referendum is needed to address facility needs at the high school and safety-and-security needs at all buildings in the school district.  A community survey was distributed in May 2015 to all residents of the school district  asking residents if they support a referendum.  The results of the survey shows 73% of all residents approve pursuing a referendum and 68% of residents support a $48.9 million referendum to address high-school and safety-and-security needs.  The board unanimously voted to move to referendum on November 8, based on input from Beaver Dam citizens and the results of the community survey.


How does our high school compare to other area high schools?
BDHS does not compare well with area high schools. BDHS is at a competitive disadvantage attracting students and families when comparing the following facilities:
  • Waupun High School is newly built
  • Dodgeland High School is newly built
  • Randolph High School is currently being built
  • Watertown High School is newly built
  • Ripon High School is newly renovated
  • Sun Prairie High School is newly built
  • Fond du Lac High School is newly built
  • Lomira High School is being built
  • Slinger High School is newly renovated
  • Oconomowoc High School is newly built


Why can’t the district pay for the facility needs at the high school within its current yearly budget?
Comprehensive needs at the high school exceed $40 million; this is more than the total budget for the school district.  While city, county, and state government can increase taxes for building needs, a school district cannot.  A school district can only present the public with a referendum to raise funds for major building projects.


What facility work has the district completed over the past five years?
The school district has completed more than $10 million of facility work since 2011, without asking taxpayers for more resources.
  • $3 million addition to Prairie View Elementary School when Trenton Elementary School closed.
  • $1 million electrical upgrade at the middle school.
  • $1 million rebuild of high-school science labs.
  • $2 million district-wide technology rebuild.
  • $3 million of upgrades to roofs, parking lots, classrooms, and heating-and-cooling systems throughout district schools.


Does the public have access to our high school for non-school related activities?
Our high school was utilized 360 of 365 days in 2015 by community groups for various reasons and activities.  Building use includes walking clubs, youth sports, community meetings, community trade shows, first responder trainings, etc.  Our high school is the most used public facility in the City of Beaver Dam. The proposed high school renovations will increase opportunities for public use of the facility.


How long will an extensive renovation of the high school take?  What impact from the construction will students experience?
A major renovation of the high school will take approximately 15 months, spanning two summers and one school year.  A successful November 2016 referendum would result in a completed high school by fall 2018.  Students would remain in the school during construction.  This is a common project in the State of Wisconsin.  This type of renovation is currently underway at Ripon High School by the construction firm that is consulting with BDUSD.  


What is the proposed completion date of the safety-and-security upgrades?
The project goal is to have major safety and security upgrades completed by September 1, 2017.


How do I know the school district is fiscally responsible?
BDUSD has the lowest tax mill rate in a five (5) county area and has the lowest spending per student in the county.  


How does the achievement of our students at BDHS compare to area high schools?
Beaver Dam High School has been recognized by U.S. News and World Report as one of the top high schools in the country (Silver Award Winner: top 10% of all high schools) in 2015 and 2016.  BDHS is an Advanced Placement Pacesetter School in the State of Wisconsin and a member of the 6th Annual Advanced Placement National Honor Roll.  BDHS has the highest ACT score (2015) in the area, outpacing Oconomowoc, Sun Prairie, Fond du Lac, and West Bend.